Daily #AI #Cat #Caturday #cats  

 Daily #AI #Cat #Caturday #cats


 

Daily #AI #cats #cat    

Daily #AI #cats #cat
 

 

Based on recent Elon's tweet: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1392602041025843203 What do you think is it worth to hold BTC or trade...

Based on recent Elon's tweet: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1392602041025843203

What do you think is it worth to hold BTC or trade now?
 

 @elonmusk #BTC #crypto

  Maybe the answer is to try and figure out what people think about the future. There are many ways to ask the right question, but a big pro...

 

Maybe the answer is to try and figure out what people think about the future.

There are many ways to ask the right question, but a big problem that many people are having is that they have forgotten the questions we might think of.

If you are someone who is interested in AI, think about the question:

What happens if humanity discovers a technology that eliminates us?

Most people think:

AI will take everything, so it should be safe. If it's just a matter of time before we destroy ourselves the best we can do is get an AI that has a high level of intelligence and self preservation potential.

Most people who study AI think the same thing, but they don't think of it as an end of human life but rather the last few steps before we die.

In other words, if AI does eliminate us, what happens to humanity?

The people who are interested in AI and have a question of their own need to ask some basic questions about what happens if humanity is completely wiped out. They can probably just as easily ask the question:

"What if they don't kill us?"

But that would be a very poor and very unsatisfactory way of thinking about the question.

The question is:

Is it more important to create the safest technology?

Or to create the biggest bang for the buck?

There are some important questions we could ask to try and get answers to those questions.

Can AI Save Us?

Are there better ways to think about this? Yes and no.

If you are going to tell people you believe in a hypothetical future, you have to tell them that you have some serious concerns about this, but also that you are certain these technologies can keep us safe. That is important, because people need to know these things.

So if you are willing to let people know you think this is a very real possibility and if you have doubts about this, it is useful to say so directly.

 


 

Pumpkin made with ML AI

Pumpkin made with ML AI

Recently I got very active on Webtalk. Here is my referral link if you want to join https://www.webtalk.co/be/home/6495052 You can fin...

Recently I got very active on Webtalk.

Here is my referral link if you want to join https://www.webtalk.co/be/home/6495052

You can find me there.

The Antikythera mechanism is an ancient Greek analogue computer and orrery used to predict astronomical positions and eclipses for calen...

The Antikythera mechanism is an ancient Greek analogue computer and orrery used to predict astronomical positions and eclipses for calendrical and astrological purposes, as well as a four-year cycle of athletic games that was similar, but not identical to, an Olympiad, the cycle of the ancient Olympic Games.

Found housed in a 340 millimetres (13 in) × 180 millimetres (7.1 in) × 90 millimetres (3.5 in) wooden box, the device is a complex clockwork mechanism composed of at least 30 meshing bronze gears. Using modern computer x-ray tomography and high resolution surface scanning, a team led by Mike Edmunds and Tony Freeth at Cardiff University peered inside fragments of the crust-encased mechanism and read the faintest inscriptions that once covered the outer casing of the machine. Detailed imaging of the mechanism suggests it dates back to 150-100 BC and had 37 gear wheels enabling it to follow the movements of the moon and the sun through the zodiac, predict eclipses and even recreate the irregular orbit of the moon. The motion, known as the first lunar anomaly, was developed by the astronomer Hipparchus of Rhodes in the 2nd century BC, and he may have been consulted in the machine's construction, the scientists speculate. Its remains were found as one lump later separated in three main fragments, which are now divided into 82 separate fragments after conservation works. Four of these fragments contain gears, while inscriptions are found on many others. The largest gear is approximately 140 millimetres (5.5 in) in diameter and originally had 224 teeth.

The artefact was recovered probably on or about July 22, 1901, according to the Julian calendar (which the Greeks continued to use at the time). That date was August 4, 1901, in the Gregorian calendar (used by then in most of the West, and now used worldwide). From the Antikythera shipwreck off the Greek island of Antikythera, which in antiquity was known as Aigila. Believed to have been designed and constructed by Greek scientists, the instrument has been variously dated to about 87 BC, or between 150 and 100 BC, or in 205 BC, or within a generation before the date of the shipwreck (in about 150 BC).

After the knowledge of this technology was lost at some point in antiquity, technological works approaching its complexity and workmanship did not appear again until the development of mechanical astronomical clocks in Europe in the fourteenth century.

All known fragments of the Antikythera mechanism are kept at the National Archaeological Museum in Athens, along with a number of artistic reconstructions of how the mechanism may have looked.

A schematic representation of the gearing of the Antikythera Mechanism, including the 2012 published interpretation of existing gearing, gearing added to complete known functions, and proposed gearing to accomplish additional functions, namely true sun pointer and pointers for the five then-known planets, as proposed by Freeth and Jones, 2012. Based also upon similar drawing in the Freeth 2006 Supplement and Wright 2005, Epicycles Part 2. Proposed (as opposed to known from the artefact) gearing crosshatched.